Search for: "People v. Juvenile Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 11:35 am
The California Supreme Court case of two juveniles caught throwing a cherry bomb at a hill that set off a large-scale brush fire was recently decided by the The People v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:30 am
The Court dismisses Sullivan v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:46 am
Supreme Court in Miller v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 8:42 am
Many Differences Unlike proceedings in regular court, juvenile proceedings have differing nomenclature and require different people and things. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 3:27 pm
In People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Equal protection requires courts to treat similarly situated classes of people the same under the law. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 11:32 am
Carp, People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:14 am
However, the Court of Appeals held that the North Carolina Industrial Commission had the authority to issue a court order for the release of juvenile records in Jane Doe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 2:03 pm
The state argued the court may impose crime-related prohibitions pursuant to State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:33 am
The consolidated cases decided this week by the Michigan Supreme Court, known as People v Carp, et al, squarelyaddressed the narrow issue of whether the SCOTUS ruling in Miller should be applied retroactively.If Miller's ban on mandatory life sentences for juveniles is applied retroactively, then the 350 juvenile lifers in MDOC prisons would have a shot at parole. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:31 pm
His sentencing took place one and one-half years after the Supreme Court decided People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Supreme Court in Miller v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the cases of Miller v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:27 am
The Supreme Court. ruling in Miller v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:57 am
Michigan Court of Appeals, in People v Killich, No. 329941, held that the Juvenile Code doesn’t allow for the imposition of a flat rate probation supervision fee, and vacated the trial court order imposing the fee and remanded for a corrected order of disposition.FACTS: Respondent Taylor Killich, a juvenile, pled no contest to a juvenile petition and was placed on probation for three months. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am
On May 25, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio granted reconsideration in State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:33 pm
Who ever thought that a 38-year old would be in juvenile court?! [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:05 am
People v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:04 am
In Graham v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
On February 27, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
