Search for: "People v. Kaplan"
Results 1 - 20
of 242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
Miller (Duke University School of Law), Alexandra Filindra (University of Illinois at Chicago), & Noah Kaplan have posted Technology, Tradition, and "The Terror of the People" (Notre Dame Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 5:52 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in a landmark 2004 case, Crawford v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:24 pm
One good thing about the California Court of Appeal is that it's generally willing to amend its opinions in order to respond to arguments contained in petitions for rehearing. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
Matter of Kaplan v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:58 pm
Last week I argued an important case, Mason v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 11:57 am
Additional Resources: Kaplan v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:18 am
The case is Carroll v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:14 am
Via Berman, the 2d Circuit has affirmed Judge Lewis Kaplan's dismissal in U.S. v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 10:34 am
Recessions often inspire people to look to law school to ride out the storm, transition into a new field, or broaden their education to make themselves a more attractive candidate,” said Jeff Thomas, director of pre-law programs, Kaplan Test Prep and Admissions. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:55 pm
Enter SDNY Judge Kaplan, who ruled three days ago in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 4:34 am
J.R. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 1:27 am
People v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 8:30 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 in the landmark case of Afroyim v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 8:30 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled in 1967 in the landmark case of Afroyim v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 5:15 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:37 pm
Kaplan v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:12 am
Constitutionally protected speech of public officers and employees McKinley v Kaplan, CA11, 262 F. 3d 1146 The general rule is that a public employee cannot be disciplined simply for exercising his or her constitutional right to free speech concerning matters of public interest. [read post]
