Search for: "People v. Kearns"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
We therefore substitute our own discretion, " even in the absence of an abuse [of discretion],' " and we modify the order by determining that defendant is a level two risk (People v Smith, 30 AD3d 1070, 1071, quoting Matter of Von Bulow, 63 NY2d 221, 224; see People v Brewer, 63 AD3d 1604). [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
All Mapp v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:01 am
” He had been a highly respected federal judge, and the author of an important antitrust, antimonopoly opinion, Addyston Pipe and Steel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:32 pm
Those other people aren't historians; they are, well, they are merchants of narrative. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 3:42 am
Ellen Kearns’ discussion of last week’s decision in Barbuto v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
” For Kearns J (citing McKenna v An Taoiseach (No.2) [1995] 2 I.R. 10) the issue of justiciability came down to whether the case involved “a clear disregard by the Government of the powers and duties conferred on it by the Constitution”. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 2:40 pm
It was ruled in People v Kearns, People v Hernandez, People v Cash, People v Sumpter, People v Salaam, Matter of Vandover v Czaika and Matter of New York Satae Bd. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Background On the morning of 11 August 2005 Mrs Clift witnessed a group of five people in the public park drinking. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:14 am
On Friday last, March 25th 2011, in ED v DPP the High Court ruled that section 12 of the Immigration Act 2004 was unconstitutional. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
In Kearns v General Council of the Bar ([2003] 1 WLR 1357), the Bar Council had published a seriously defamatory statement circulated to all heads of chambers, senior clerks and practice managers in England and Wales. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:08 am
Anyway, this “v-card” dispute illustrates why people hate lawyers, but it’s pretty funny. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J gave two examples of the common good: the case concerned a ban on religious advertising in section 10(3) of the Radio and Television Act, 1988 (also here), and Barrington J (at [30]) held that the ban in section 10(3) could be justified either to prevent public unrest, or to ensure that, in matters of sensitivity, rich people “should not be able to buy access to the airwaves to the detriment of their poorer rivals”.… [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 1:23 pm
Read their opinion here: Dewalt v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:31 am
"); Kearns v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 3:01 pm
Some people have additional arguments. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:15 am
: Rights and Remedies after State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Vawter and Kearns also decided today.) [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
His approach was markedly different from the established approach in a duty/interest case, particularly where there is a pre-existing relationship between publisher and publisher: compare, eg, Horrocks v Lowe [1975] AC 135 HL and Kearns v General Council of the Bar [2003] 1 WLR 1357 CA. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 12:41 pm
That case, Fitisemanu v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am
” More significant was his draft opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
