Search for: "People v. Kelly" Results 181 - 200 of 848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2011, 5:23 am by James Eckert
But while the jury was actually deliberating, it has always been clear that they had to do so together.Until now.The Court of Appeals has just decided People v Robert Kelly (#58 decided 3/24/11). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:15 am by Jeanne Long
Justice Hathaway concurred in Justice Kelly’s dissent, and wrote separately to emphasize consternation at the Court’s failure to adhere to People v Hunter and to contest the evidence that the pilot program, and predeliberation jury discussions generally, enhance a jury’s ability to reach a fair result   [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Horvath, Heller Ehrman LLP, New York, NY Highlights in competitor and consumer lawsuits: Axcan v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:00 am by Liisa Speaker
The MCOA affirmed his convictions in 2004 in People v Titus, (Docket No. 243642). [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 10:04 am by Eugene Volokh
“If you’re going to stand up and say something that other people will find offensive, then you need to be prepare to deal with the ramifications of that,” Kelly said. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
Its only leeway available to the administrative tribunal is in recommending or imposing a penalty.The decision in Kelly [Kelly v Levin, 440 NYS2d 424] illustrates this point. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:01 pm by Matthew Nelson
In People v Washington, the Michigan Supreme Court denied defendant’s application for leave to appeal. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:41 pm by Julie Lam
The Michigan Supreme Court also denied the motion for stay in People v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:10 am
IP: the "no-patents round-up for non-techie people" -- today's conference organised by CLT and hosted in London's Grange Fitzrovia Hotel -- was opened by James Tumbridge (Pillsbury), speaking on trade mark and trade dress protection. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm by Rick Hasen
As the Court of Appeals so eloquently stated in Senior Accountants, Analysts & Appraisers Ass’n v Detroit, 218 Mich App 263, 270; 553, NW2d 679 (1996): The wisdom of the principle of judicial restraint expressed by our Supreme Court in [Attorney General v Ingham Circuit Judge, 347 Mich 579; 81 NW2d 349 (1957)], is self-evident; the notion that our courts may precipitously intervene in the political arena and preempt a vote of the people is inconsistent with both… [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 9:08 am by Madelaine Lane
The Court also denied rehearing in People v. [read post]