Search for: "People v. Kelly" Results 221 - 240 of 850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
Here are the facts in last week’s 8th District decision in Middleburg Heights v. [read post]
The court considered the proximity in space and time to the workplace, the pressure for employees to attend, and the following facts: The majority of the people at each party were employees;The employer sponsored the initial party;It provided alcohol and encouraged employees to drink;The after-party was a continuation of the first party; andThe employer may have known about Walsh’s previous inappropriate behavior.Phelps v. [read post]
The court considered the proximity in space and time to the workplace, the pressure for employees to attend, and the following facts: The majority of the people at each party were employees;The employer sponsored the initial party;It provided alcohol and encouraged employees to drink;The after-party was a continuation of the first party; andThe employer may have known about Walsh’s previous inappropriate behavior.Phelps v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
id=62ac2fc048370f4c2c31b714 ALLEGEDLY INFRINGING URLS: https://conlinpa.com/2016/04/03/hyman-v-daoud/ As you might gather, you can't stop people from writing about you by registering your name as a trademark. [* * *] Here's that post from last week: I wrote about Hyman v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:55 am by SHG
  Last September, Kelly issued a department-wide directive to stop arresting people for possessing small amounts of marijuana, unless the drug was displayed in plain view. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:43 pm
Actually, the prosecutor eliminated all five black people from a final jury pool of 36 people. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
Related, CPSC finally holds public hearing on magnet sets standard [WLF Legal Pulse] SCOTUS sleeper Bond v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:27 pm
Reporting on the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in the case of Michael Dean Overstreet v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 10:47 am by Jeff Gamso
  I think that's mostly because 2008 had the moratorium due to Baze v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
Merely speeding down the street, even in tandem with another vehicle, does not constitute a "speed contest" within the meaning of that statute (see People v Grund, 14 NY2d 32; see also Shea v Kelly, 121 AD2d 620, 621). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:05 pm by Layla Kuhl
In People v Hill, the Court affirmed in part and reversed in part the Court of Appeals judgment. [read post]