Search for: "People v. Kelly"
Results 301 - 320
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2007, 1:56 am
The article is an offshoot of a speech Steve recently gave for JP Morgan (Hong Kong) and it is entitled "Danone v. [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 10:37 pm
This time Ken, we don't agree with your holding, but we do like your reasoning.In People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:10 pm
" (Minnesota Independent)Adoption - LousianaLaw professor Arthur Leonard analyzes yesterday's ruling in Adar v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:08 pm
Christopher Kelly, who argued the landmark sentencing case Booker v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm
Democratic Justice Marilyn Kelly and Republican Sixth Circuit (and former Michigan Supreme Court Justice James P. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
In an op-ed at Fox News, Kelly Shackleford weighs in on The American Legion v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
Dean v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:48 am
A settlement has been reached in Stinson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:31 am
Then again, it’s worked well publicly for New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg* and his police commissioner, Ray Kelly, who rode the stop and frisk horse to notoriety until SDNY Judge Shira Scheindlin held it unconstitutional in Floyd v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:11 am
Kelli B. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
Kelly, 62 Va. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Noting that its opinion conflicted with Kelly v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am
Next up is Kelly v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Conte v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am
They wanted to use originalism to overturn Plessy v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 12:30 pm
One they missed: Facebook v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Bookstores v Auxiliary Serv. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:10 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:44 am
It is much easier for the prosecutor to introduce such evidence in an sexual assault trial.In the People v Watkins case, the Michigan Supreme Court, recognizing the irresolvable conflict between the evidentiary rule and the statute, held that the statute controls. [read post]
