Search for: "People v. Kelly"
Results 101 - 120
of 847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
Aleksandr V. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:08 pm
V. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 7:00 am
The novel is structured around the mythical and endless case, Jarndyce v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
No. 163 (SCJ, Kelly) at para. 32. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
Mike Kelly to obtain information about stock trades. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
In Bellotti v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
Trade Representative (USTR) Katherine Tai and company executives, including CEO Alfred Kelly. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
Trade Representative (USTR) Katherine Tai and company executives, including CEO Alfred Kelly. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 3:50 am
I mentioned this on the twitters and was told by a follower I respect that it went on to be inspirational, an exploration of human motivations and growth, greed v. fear v. life situations for people who had never been exposed to inhumanity. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:34 am
Urges Supreme Court to Uphold Roe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court decision in 2013, and another this year, weakened the landmark law, while Republican-controlled Legislatures passed new voting restrictions advocates say target people of color, as well as young and working-class people. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm
Patent and Trademark Office updated its guidance related to the recent United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:00 am
The court considered the proximity in space and time to the workplace, the pressure for employees to attend, and the following facts: The majority of the people at each party were employees;The employer sponsored the initial party;It provided alcohol and encouraged employees to drink;The after-party was a continuation of the first party; andThe employer may have known about Walsh’s previous inappropriate behavior.Phelps v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:00 am
The court considered the proximity in space and time to the workplace, the pressure for employees to attend, and the following facts: The majority of the people at each party were employees;The employer sponsored the initial party;It provided alcohol and encouraged employees to drink;The after-party was a continuation of the first party; andThe employer may have known about Walsh’s previous inappropriate behavior.Phelps v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 12:01 pm
In Kelly v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
People perspire. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 8:16 pm
& Loan Assoc. v. [read post]
