Search for: "People v. Kelly"
Results 141 - 160
of 731
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court decision in 2013, and another this year, weakened the landmark law, while Republican-controlled Legislatures passed new voting restrictions advocates say target people of color, as well as young and working-class people. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm
Patent and Trademark Office updated its guidance related to the recent United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:00 am
The court considered the proximity in space and time to the workplace, the pressure for employees to attend, and the following facts: The majority of the people at each party were employees;The employer sponsored the initial party;It provided alcohol and encouraged employees to drink;The after-party was a continuation of the first party; andThe employer may have known about Walsh’s previous inappropriate behavior.Phelps v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:00 am
The court considered the proximity in space and time to the workplace, the pressure for employees to attend, and the following facts: The majority of the people at each party were employees;The employer sponsored the initial party;It provided alcohol and encouraged employees to drink;The after-party was a continuation of the first party; andThe employer may have known about Walsh’s previous inappropriate behavior.Phelps v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 12:01 pm
In Kelly v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 8:16 pm
& Loan Assoc. v. [read post]
29 May 2021, 5:25 pm
” Ganung v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Most people see the negotiations as an implicit concession that the material is protected by copyright (or by some other type of intellectual property). [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:36 pm
[emphasis added] The reference to Justices Armstrong and Kelly were in R. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:20 pm
It was nothing more than a fancy tape recording; as to which, last I checked, there isn't really much of a Kelly/Frye dispute. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 1:57 pm
FTC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 10:51 am
Alabama, 219 US 219, 234 (1911) (quoting Kelly v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 10:55 am
This case, Campbell v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
And no way out for the people of Georgia, either. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:27 am
One of the most vocal residents, Kelly Franklin, has begun circulating a petition that she aims to present to the owner of Time Inc. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 6:45 am
" In any event, a pardon or reprieve by a governor is in the nature of "neutralizing a conviction for an offense" by the then sitting governor granted to an individual earlier found guilty of committing an offense in contrast to a sitting governor's effort to neutralize the conviction of an individual found guilty of an offense after such governor has left office. * New York State's Penal Law was amended by adding a new section, §40.51, authorizing the prosecution of… [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 12:00 am
" In any event, a pardon or reprieve by a governor is in the nature of "neutralizing a conviction for an offense" by the then sitting governor granted to an individual earlier found guilty of committing an offense in contrast to a sitting governor's effort to neutralize the conviction of an individual found guilty of an offense after such governor has left office. * New York State's Penal Law was amended by adding a new section, §40.51, authorizing the prosecution of… [read post]