Search for: "People v. Kelly (1990)"
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Conte v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
” Kelly v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:54 pm
Kelly, 420 So.2d 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), ten days of exposure to chemicals (chemical exposure cases apply the same principles); see, also, Moore v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:31 pm
It was my plan to write about Billy Wayne Coble, more precisely, to write about the opinion in Billy Wayne Coble v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz challenge the defendants’ use of images of their artwork, registered with the U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
People v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 3:55 am
(See DPP v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
Kelly v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:18 am
Koons; Kelly v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
Rules v. standards—some carveouts are one, some the other. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
Supreme Court of California, January 21, 2010 People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2006, 11:51 pm
La France v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:00 pm
Bob Price of Breitbart reports that Judge Kelly W. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:49 pm
Kelly, 2010 WL 1685582 [SDNY, Apr. 26, 2010]). [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:14 am
Random House, Inc. and New Era Publications International ApS v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
