Search for: "People v. Kelly (1992)" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
Many religious people are understandably upset when they have to subsidize blasphemy. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm by Fiona de Londras
The case of Z v United Kingdom (2001) 34 ECHR 97 illustrates this well. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Schachtman
”), aff’d sub nom., Juni v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:14 am by Terry Hart
Random House, Inc. and New Era Publications International ApS v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
And one needs only to look at a lawsuit brought by singer-actress Ginger Rogers to see how the court may view such use.Dancing with the StarsIn Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In the 1996 decision of R v Hinchey, the Supreme Court went through this offence in detail and provided a breakdown of exactly what the Crown needed to prove in order to get a conviction. [read post]