Search for: "People v. King" Results 281 - 300 of 2,498
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Guest Author
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am by Reference Staff
Martinez was part of the legal team that represented the petitioner in the landmark case Griggs v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm by Jonathan Movroydis
Cogan and Michael McConnell discuss the US Supreme Court amicus brief they filed, along with scholars Christopher DeMuth and Peter Wallison, in Biden v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:39 pm by Josh Blackman
In my earlier post, I recalled that Justice Kagan had asked hypotheticals about her law clerks during oral argument in King v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
On reply, Willard argued that “the law in New York plainly favors a buy-out as opposed to the liquidation of an on-going company – certainly one like Matrix that employs several dozen or hundreds of people at any given time. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:13 pm by Florian Mueller
The FTC and DOJ's guiding principle these days--including this month's new United States et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
He was just six years old when the Court decided Brown v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Grunwick Processing Laboratories Ltd v ACAS: The Social Contract, Trade Union Recognition, and the Rule of LawKD Ewing (King's College London, UK)7. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]