Search for: "People v. King" Results 41 - 60 of 2,837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2024, 5:37 pm by David M. Boertje
The February 2023 case (Sharpe v Winterville Police Department) involved a motorist who was stopped by police. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
(EcuRed, Letra del Año)).The object of the annual letter is to provide guidance for the nation and its people, as well as more technical advice for the orisha communities of initiates and believers. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
After this case was publicized, the Manitoba Court of King’s Bench issued a practice direction mandating that “when artificial intelligence has been used in the preparation of materials filed with the court, the materials must indicate how artificial intelligence was used. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
People often think that “marriage” and “family” are synonymous, but these words are not interchangeable in law. [read post]
I thought we might talk a little bit about what is probably the leading case on dress codes, Jespersen v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Beatrice Yahia
Footage showed people covered in powder from the extinguisher as security guards rushed people out of the vicinity. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 5:16 pm by Josh Blackman
Recently, during the oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm by Josh Blackman
There was no tradition of the King appointing members to be King or to succeed the King. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
The case of King v Victor Parsons & Co [1973] 1 WLR 29 examined the situation where a person acted recklessly “like the man who turns a blind eye” determining that a person who “refrained from further inquiry lest awareness of a risk should prove to be correct, was said to be in the same position as a person who acted knowingly”. [read post]