Search for: "People v. King"
Results 801 - 820
of 2,515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2018, 1:02 pm
The tragedy is only the latest incident in which Bashar al-Assad’s military has used chemical weapons on its own people. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 8:30 am
See Korematsu v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
Civil Liberties website: Writing in McCreary County, Kentucky v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 6:10 am
To paraphrase Justice Robert Jackson in the case of Pollock v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
The writer argues in his letter that (i) the evidence does not support the conclusion that there is systemic racism in the legal professions, (ii) the claim of systemic racism vilifies lawyers and paralegals by labelling them as racist, (iii) the 13 recommendations are a form of unauthorized social engineering, (iv) racism and bullying are just part of life and should be simply be endured and overcome by racialized licensees as others have done before them, (v) the true problem is economic… [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm
Woodward v Grice [2017] EWHC 1292 (QB)(King J). [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:17 am
Janus v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 2:53 am
You can use state power, ultimately the barrel of a gun, to compel people to do what you think is right. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:08 am
King County. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:03 am
Fairness to deceased’s estates about benefiting from use v. other people w/no connection.Amy Maggs: Central staff/drafter. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:28 am
Berger v Rokeach 2017 NY Slip Op 27374 Decided on November 20, 2017 Supreme Court, Kings County Silber, J. answers these questions with a strong degree of specificity. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
Rumsfeld (2004) (allowing detention of a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant) and in Boumediene v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:21 am
Mounsey v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 1:02 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:15 am
On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Browder v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm
., Zivotofsky v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
The fact that the statute describes whistleblowers as employees who report to the SEC did not dispose of the employee’s argument because terms can operate differently in different contexts, as the Supreme Court reasoned in upholding most of the Affordable Care Act (King v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
First, it is a matter of fact that people rarely make up sexual misconduct. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
As the court noted recently in Riley v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am
The duty is about protecting people from the poisonous and pernicious influence of extremist ideas that are used to legitimise terrorism. [read post]
