Search for: "People v. King"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2015, 5:57 am
In King v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 10:17 pm
King. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:50 am
On March 5, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in Marcella King Piazza v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
In King v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:35 pm
Much ink has been spilled over what Republicans must do if the Supreme Court decides, in the upcoming case of King v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:28 pm
The case, Whyte Monkee Productions v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
Friday’s welcome-but-unexpected grant in King v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:19 am
"Writes Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker about the King v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:24 am
Dolan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 6:08 am
In People v King a two to one panel of the Court of Appeals narrowly defined what a locked enclosure was in a manufacturing of marijuana case. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:43 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In 2009, a Ninth Circuit panel held (in Nordyke v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:16 pm
Prior posts on King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 9:33 am
Painted in 1985 by an artist named Jose Mesa V. and an ensemble of East Side youth, the intricate wall art depicted the history of Chicano people, from the Aztecs of old to the laborers led by Cesar Chavez. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 8:26 pm
Iran v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:15 am
King. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:47 pm
In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court has upheld the tax credit premium assistance (subsidies) provided to individuals who live in states without a state operated health insurance exchange.The case is King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:47 pm
In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court has upheld the tax credit premium assistance (subsidies) provided to individuals who live in states without a state operated health insurance exchange.The case is King v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 10:12 am
The Court distinguished People v Fiumefreddo (82 NY2d 536 [1993]) because, unlike Fiumefreddo, here the specific terms of this plea were not subject to extended discussion nor did defendant have sufficient time to consider the alternatives to taking it. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
King. 1. [read post]
