Search for: "People v. King" Results 121 - 140 of 2,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2021, 12:44 pm by Josh Blackman
IRS was only the second majority opinion to cite NFIB, after King v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 11:58 am
Shockingly (not), Justice King rejects that contention. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
Tuesday afternoon I had the pleasure of debating/discussing King v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
  (In truth, we don't actually know Person B took it into his house, but let's assume we think he probably did because that's where most people generally keep retained weapons). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 5:50 pm by tjsllibrary
Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision in the coming weeks about the Affordable Care Act in the case of King v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:35 pm
In this respect, the federalism principles at issue here are strikingly similar to those that arose in the Affordable Care Act case of King v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:12 am by David Oscar Markus
The issue presented to the Court was: "Whether the Fourth Amendment allows the states to collect and analyze DNA from people arrested and charged with serious crimes." [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm by Francisco Macías
Chocolate and Its King   Charles V, King of Spain and Emperor of Germany, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing right As one of the most prominent encounters between the Spaniards and the native peoples of the Americas occurred in what is now Mexico, it is not unusual to see that many words that were added to the lexicon of Castile have their origins in Nahuatl and Mayan, the languages of the peoples of this region. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:02 am by Kit Case
Plus: 20 stats about Obamacare Republicans don’t want you to see Asked what he might get out of King v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
Hurles opens the field for the next Relist King. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
These days, due to cutbacks in hiring, IRS people tend to be overworked, such that there less aggressive hassling taxpayer’s. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 This duty of fair dealing encompasses an obligation to ensure fairness in grand jury submissions (People v Pelchat, supra; People v Jordan, 153 AD2d 263 [2nd Dept 1990]; People v Russo, 128 Misc2d 876, 880 [Co Ct Suffolk Co 1985]), which includes notice of the grand jury proceedings that gives a defendant a reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to testify, not mere technical compliance with minimum statutory notice requirements… [read post]