Search for: "People v. Kirkes"
Results 81 - 100
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm
Kirk Wiebe, Edward Snowden and countless anonymous whistleblowers, as well as the tenacious efforts of litigators under the Freedom of Information Act. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
L. & Pol’y 451-489 (2010).Werksman, Jacob and Kirk Herbertson. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm
And there is something Kirk-like about the Raelian “prophet,” Claude Vorilhon. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Panel 3: CopyrightSarah Polcz, Loyalties v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:28 am
People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
Appx. 902, 905 (2d Cir. 2005) (noting that “deliberate falsehoods enjoy no First Amendment protection,” in the context of a prosecution for knowingly false statements on an immigration application); People v. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 6:06 am
Eisenhower's nefarious plan to enforce Brown v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am
Kirk explains that, “[w]hile making no compromises, Xi at least [has] made clear he really doesn’t want to see war breaking out. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 5:54 am
Raquel Castañeda-López, Detroit City Council Member Amina Kirk, Senior Legal and Policy Advocate & Organizer, Detroit People’s Platform Olga Pomar, New Jersey Legal Services Ilya Somin, Professor of Law, George Mason University Sean White, Director of Fund Development, Develop Detroit Dispossession Reform Round Tables4:00 – 4:45 PM Small group discussions with speakers and participants discussing reforms to current issues of… [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Selman, and Kirk E. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 8:00 pm
In this case, the appeal court upheld the just-cause termination of a senior manager responsible for safety when his employer discovered—after having terminated his employment without cause—that he had used his company cell phone to solicit illegal drugs from several people, including a direct subordinate (Van den Boogaard v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:42 am
This changed in 1977 with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Bates v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
Kirk Johnson has penned an opinion piece in the Times. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:37 am
The decision in Anderson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
Who would ever have thought so many people held such views? [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:05 pm
Trade Representative Ron Kirk announced that members of the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Because it's almost inevitable - rummage through enough documents and emails of enough people (a quarter million or so will do) and eventually you're very likely to discover somebody saying, or doing, or proposing something dumb. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
He also played a major role in the landmark legal case of Bayard v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:52 am
Learn more about Coons v. [read post]
