Search for: "People v. Lane"
Results 181 - 200
of 943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 2:14 pm
In lieu of granting leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 2:47 pm
From last week’s Pennsylvania trial court decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:45 am
In 2014 in GRANGER et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 3:49 am
Three people were taken to local hospitals. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 11:04 am
This is enough time to miss seeing a driver ahead that hit their brakes, not see someone who has stepped out onto the road or veer out of your lane. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:31 am
Some people always have watery bloodshot eyes. [read post]
29 May 2019, 1:45 pm
See Milo v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:20 pm
When you leave my property, you hit (in order) (1) the sidewalk, (2) a two-lane roadway, (3) on the other side of the road, a dirt pathway, and then (4) the ocean. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:01 am
The Supreme Court struck down this law as well, but not until 23 years later in Lane v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:39 pm
From the opinion in People v Deer, decided March 19 in St. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:04 am
, three detectives from the New Bedford police department’s gang unit observed a sedan making an improper lane change, prompting them to activate their lights and follow the vehicle. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:17 am
In the case Gevo v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In Edwards v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 7:09 am
First, Twitter adopted a “Civic Integrity Policy” and created a “Partner Support Portal,” a fast lane for governments and other trusted sources to report problematic election-related tweets. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
"With that, the AT2 got Ortreger out of a major jam.To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 6:38 pm
People v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 1:11 pm
In Issakhani v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 10:59 am
Over on Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has posted a thoughtful and fair-minded response to our study of public interpretations of the Scott v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 2:19 pm
In the end, a claim of ineffectiveness is ultimately concerned with the fairness of the process as a whole rather than its particular impact on the outcome of the DUI case as held in People v Benevento and People v Prescod. [read post]
