Search for: "People v. Langley"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
At which point, against his lawyer's advice (needless to say), he testified that (1) yeah, he was the one who committed the robberies and murder, (2) but that's only because his body had been controlled by "the project,"; and (3) "with the money he stole, he thought he might buy some cigarettes and catch a plane to Langley to 'get to the bottom of this mind control project.'" Didn't quite work out that way, of course. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 9:51 pm
Kyllo v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:07 am
” This allegedly caused historic posts to be bylined as “Tito and Tita Langley” rather than “La Baguette. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 3:39 pm
Langley (4th Cir. 1995) (en banc). [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:43 am
Langley (4th Cir. 1995) (en banc). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:40 pm
In Chan v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:30 am
A case involving Dale Langley (my partner's) previous firm, Langley & Co, called Taylor v Connex South Eastern EAT/1243/99 [2000] held that a lapse of two years was insufficient. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
Langley (Township), 2007 BCSC 993 [Aberdeen]; reversed in part, Aberdeen v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:09 am
Today, in Reed v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:52 pm
See, Langley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:12 pm
In today’s case (Mavi v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
The primary interest was how the court would resolve what most people saw as a clash between competing rights. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:13 am
But U.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:15 am
The case, Langley v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 2:02 pm
Finally, in 2002 in Hampton v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 8:39 pm
The BC court in Yates v Langley Motor Sport Centre Ltd. is the only one of these decisions that engaged directly with the statutory provisions, and concluded that CERB should be deducted based on a review of s. 6(1)(b) of the Canada Emergency Response Benefit Act. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Since 1989, 568 people have been exonerated because of DNA testing; 57 percent of them were African American. [read post]
