Search for: "People v. Latham"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2010, 9:10 am
Obviously, Latham tipsters were not impressed: They are promoting it as a flexible policy that needs to be implemented as people don’t really log vacation time correctly. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:34 pm
I know that everyone wants to read the Ninth Circuit's gay marriage decision that came down today. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 1:08 pm
” [Citations]; see also People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
" Big O Tires, Inc. v. 67 and Latham, LLC, Oppositions Nos. 91178685 and 91178688 (November 18, 2008) [not precedential].Applicant contended that the first du Pont factor, the similarity or dissimilarity of the marks, outweighed all other factors. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
A thousand thanks to the IPKat's friends at the London office of Latham & Watkins LLP for hosting this year's IP Publishers and Editors Lunch on behalf of this weblog. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:06 am
" (Parenthetically: Latham, which represented the appellees, should know better than to make this basic mistake -- a mistake that likely cost the City a monetary benefit that it can ill-afford to lose. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 4:00 am
Judge Weill's opinion last week in Eaton v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
At his retirement in 1952, Chief Justice John Latham (himself a deeply conservative figure and former Opposition Leader) declared (in light of the trouble and controversy that the section had caused lawyers and judges alike) that '[w]hen I die, s. 92 will be found written on my heart': (1952) 85 CLR ix. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
Donald Trump, et al. (23-CR-80101-AMC) New York (NY): The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
PatLit announces a talk next Tuesday by Latham & Watkins' Don McCombie on what Europe's new patent regime means for junior practitioners, this talk for IPSoc has been arranged on the back of Don's Brave New World series of posts for that weblog. [read post]
2 May 2007, 1:18 am
People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:11 am
”Working with NITA’s fictitious “Homestead Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am
Garre, now chair of the appellate practice at Latham & Watkins, in Washington. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:06 am
” “‘From a discovery standpoint, you’re sending documents and communicating with clients and other people and you’re going to have to search those emails in future,’ the person said. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:31 pm
Above the Law reached out to recruiting people at Vinson & Elkins. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 1:58 pm
Counsel for the applicant was Robert Latham, instructed by Southwark Law Centre. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Brownback v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 8:43 am
The case—City of Boise v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:44 pm
Porter Magill v. [read post]
