Search for: "People v. LeBlanc" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal To Help 2024 Voters, Meta Says It Will Begin Labeling Political Ads That Use AI-Generated Imagery ABC News – David Klepper (Associated Press) | Published: 11/8/2023 Facebook and Instagram will require political ads running on their platforms to disclose if they were created using artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:55 am by Patrick C. Toomey
Some examples of the people FBI agents have targeted with queries: Black Lives Matter protestors; January 6 suspects; 19,000 donors to a congressional campaign; a U.S. [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:39 am by Matthew Guariglia
We—EFF along with many partners around the world at Let’s Encrypt and elsewhere—created a baseline of privacy (and security) protection for people around the world. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
Kylie Atwood and Paul LeBlanc report for CNN. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:45 am by Emma Snell
Holmes Lybrand and Paul LeBlanc report for CNN. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The panel is investigating who, including people in Trump’s inner circle, had any role in planning or enabling the worst assault on the Capitol since the War of 1812. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:58 am by Eugene Volokh
John Villasenor for the pointer; see this Detroit News article (Beth LeBlanc & Craig Mauger) for more. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:19 am by James Romoser
The blog of Burnham & Borokhov, PLLC, analyzes the petitioner’s opening brief and the arguments of several amicus briefs in Van Buren v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
Once again, a meta-analysis is advanced as a basis for an expert witness’s causation opinion, and once again, the opinion is the subject of a Rule 702 challenge. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
LeBlanc, 16-1177, concluding that Graham v. [read post]