Search for: "People v. LeBlanc" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
Inter partes review is an administrative mechanism the America Invents Act created in 2011 to allow people to challenge issued patents. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Canada The case of Hudspeth v Whatcott 2017 ONSC 1708 concerned a proposed class action on behalf of 500,000 people who marched on the 2016 Pride Toronto Parade. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
Spare a thought for artist Matt LeBlanc, lawyer Paul McCartney, and writer Julia Roberts, who would probably have trouble registering a trade mark for their own name! [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
Spare a thought for artist Matt LeBlanc, lawyer Paul McCartney, and writer Julia Roberts, who would probably have trouble registering a trade mark for their own name! [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm by Old Fox
He was given a three-month prison sentence, of which he served about 45 days.Trinh declined to be interviewed by AP, and efforts to locate Lam were unsuccessful.Judith Beals, a former state prosecutor involved in the cases, said Wahlberg's crimes stand out because he violated the injunction with an even more violent attack on people of yet another race. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Blondin Leblanc, 2014 QCCS 4365, pits twelve heirs, who are also siblings, against each other with respect to the administration of their late mother’s estate. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 6:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
She is a legend, going back to her work on the LCO treaty rights cases in Wisconsin, the LeBlanc matter in Michigan, and United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
 Jack http://t.co/xWoUgqeZi5 -> Google ordered by BC court to block websites selling pirated goods: Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
” Mr Justice LeBlanc, delivering judgment also considered the principles set out by the Canadian Supreme Court in Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 and R v Mentuck, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442 (“the Dagenais/Mentuck test”), namely that a request for a publication ban may be ordered when: (a)   such an order is necessary in order to prevent a serious risk to the proper administration of justice because reasonably alternative… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
A Nova Scotia lawyer is on the hook for $28,000 owed to a former client after the province’s court of appeal overturned a lower court ruling that found paid accounts were not subject to assessment.In a 3-0 decision in Mor-Town Developments Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:09 am by Freda Carmack
Leblanc and adopt recommendation from a nearly decade old report by former Canadian Supreme Court Chief Justice Antonio Lamer. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:13 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
LeBlanc, Ada Huibregtse, & Timothy Meister, Compliance with the reporting requirements of human rights conventions [read post]