Search for: "People v. Lee (1970)"
Results 61 - 80
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
The Battle for Blawg Review of the Year Like the movie business, with its Academy Awards, the business of blog reviewing is highly competitive. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
The Battle for Blawg Review of the Year Like the movie business, with its Academy Awards, the business of blog reviewing is highly competitive. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
(Pix credit here: With eye on China, EU parliament pushes tougher line on investments)Europe appears to be faced, again, with the hard task of balancing its relations among frenemies while retaining its wealth. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
ACLU v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
v=ngxZVmtKCCo&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
Johnsen, editor.New York : Nova Science Publishers, c2011.KF6668.P22 2007 U2 2011International TradeLaw and development perspective on international trade law / edited by Yong-Shik Lee ... [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
FDA Advances Program for Real-World Evidence February 27, 2023 | Blair Bean Robertson, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals FDA’s approach to evidence-based decision-making may not be addressed to the right people. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Powell v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
But some calls for reform arise more from a felt need to respond to what are seen as abuses of the confirmation process in very recent years.[13] As is well-known, the Senate refused even to consider President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in March 2016, shortly after the death of Justice Scalia in February, on the ground that it was within 8 months of a presidential election and the Senate should wait and “give the people a voice” in the selection of a new… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Francis v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
rates charged, the necessity of the services, whether they were performed within a reasonable time commensurate with the problem, the trustee’s skill and experience, and whether the amount of compensation is reasonable in comparison with what is charged by comparably skilled people. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Most consumers agree that intellectual property law is essential to ensure that creators of inventions, ideas, designs, services and the like are rewarded for their creativity and to promote the continuation of such creations.[1] In order to grant creators with the incentive to continue creating, such creators must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that their creations will not be transformed into cheap imitations which will inevitably compete with their own original creations. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
