Search for: "People v. Lee (1990)"
Results 1 - 20
of 162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2016, 1:38 pm
The case is Lee v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:02 pm
In Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin v Lee Kuan Yew ([1990] 2 M.L.J. 65) the Singapore Court of Appeal made it clear that the right to free speech was subject, inter alia, to the common law of defamation as modified by the Defamation Act: “An absolute or unrestricted right of free speech would result in persons recklessly maligning others with impunity and the exercise of such a right would do the public more harm than good. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:22 pm
Smith v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
(Orin Kerr) Today’s news that Paul Clement is leaving King & Spaulding over his defense of DOMA reminds me of one of the big stories among Harvard Law students when I was a student there back in the mid-1990s: The boycott of Sidley & Austin for its representation of the state of Colorado in Romer v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:16 pm
By Lee DavisUnited States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
After, I enlisted in the Air Force and served from 1986-1990. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 10:08 am
Lee (1982); Hernandez v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
But the ruling isn't based on free speech or religious libertyIn Lee v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
But the ruling isn't based on free speech or religious libertyIn Lee v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 7:02 am
Like the Little Rascals case, most of these daycare abuse accusations turned out to be false.Riddick Room display of Little Rascals Daycare Case Papers; curated by Lee Cloninger & Cas LaskowskiThe Little Rascals Daycare material primarily concerns State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:42 am
See Abecassis v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:54 am
Lee), or seizing adult pornography in the home which is a constitutionally protected right (Stanley v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 3:07 am
That is, the 11th Circuit decided in NAACP v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 4:47 pm
Rejectiong this argument, the Fourth Department held that The court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the expert's testimony would not be relevant in view of the facts of this case (see generally People v Young, 7 NY3d 40, 44-45; People v Lee, 96 NY2d 157, 162). [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:44 pm
United States, 110 S.Ct 668 (1990)). [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:56 am
We only have space for 100 people. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 12:00 pm
Among Gilmore’s most important contributions to EFF and to the movement for digital rights has been recruiting key people to the organization, such as former Executive Director Shari Steele, current Executive Director Cindy Cohn, and Senior Staff Attorney and Adams Chair for Internet Rights Lee Tien. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
People v. [read post]
