Search for: "People v. Levy" Results 121 - 140 of 836
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Researchers have revealed the specific harms and disproportionate negative impacts surveillance and algorithmic tools can have on disabled people in education, the legal system, health care and the workplace. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 pm by Sandy Levinson
  I would strongly hope that a truly honest dissent would begin as follows: "Roe v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am by Michael Douglas
Therefore, going beyond the law is contrary to the will of the people. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:27 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
It’s hard not to feel sorry for the petitioner in Fernandes v Matrix Model Staffing, Inc., Decision and Order, Index No. 160294/2021 [Sup Ct, NY County Apr. 20, 2022]. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:55 am by jonathanturley
In 1895, Congress sought to impose an income tax, but was stopped by the Supreme Court in Pollock v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
He concludes, largely on the strength of the SCOTUS opinion in Hartman v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:43 am by Eugene Volokh
Wash.) in United Federation of Churches, LLC d/b/a The Satanic Temple v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
This writer has never heard of such levies even being considered, and any such levies could deter innovation in this space due to the public's lack of desire for its implementation due to costs. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
This writer has never heard of such levies even being considered, and any such levies could deter innovation in this space due to the public's lack of desire for its implementation due to costs. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
In 1895, Congress sought to impose an income tax, but was stopped by the Supreme Court in Pollock v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm by Sam Wong
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in West Virginia v. [read post]