Search for: "People v. Lewis" Results 21 - 40 of 1,171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2022, 8:09 am by DONALD SCARINCI
It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
IPSO 09326-21 Kennedy v Real People, 1 Accuracy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), No breach – after investigation 11214-21 Zaman v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were two defamation (libel and slander) claims filed on the media and communications list last week. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
  From 1795 through 1934, Congress regularly sanctioned people who defied its authority, and many Supreme Court decisions recognized its “inherent” power to do so. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What is most interesting about Fraley’s data, I think, is its demonstration that at least some people somewhere are always talking about court-packing. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The LSE Media Blog has an article on recent findings of an evidence review on young people’s digital literacy, online resilience and wellbeing, conducted as part of research for the ySKILLS project. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
  As we mention below, judgment was given in the PTR last week.is The Facebook Oversight Board has upheld the 7 January 2021 decision to ban former-President Donald Trump from the platform, after his social media activity was partially blamed for inciting the violence at the January 6 Capitol riots, in which five people died. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar Professor of Law and International Affairs Acting University Ombudsperson (from October 2021) University Ombudsperson Elect Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802    1.814.863.3640 (direct) ||  lcb11@psu.edu     I appreciate the turnout for an event that by its title would no longer create the buzz and excitement that it might have in the 17thcentury, much less the 13th. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The post cites the costs to privacy, freedom of speech (such as the ‘legal but harmful’ concept), the ‘duty of care’ demanded of online service providers to limit or even ban both encryption and anonymity, the political control of censorship via Ofcom, and the “mammoth and costly bureaucratic burdens being foisted on people operating online services” as some of the many reasons that the proposed Bill might be doing more harm than good. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
The UK GDPR has previously been successful in suing people who may have undesirable/compromising information about an someone on their device. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Government has added two new duties to the proposed Online Safety Bill  that are aimed at protecting people against anonymous online abuse. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Erin Molan and Nyadol Nyuon have said it would be “almost impossible” to uptake and not “useful” to most people in Australia due to the cost and effort involved, the Guardian reports. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Jeff Kosseff
" A barrier to the NAACP's argument for anonymous speech rights was Lewis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
  Judgment was reserved On 9 March 2022 HHJ Lewis heard an application in the case of Suleman v Badejo. [read post]