Search for: "People v. Llewellyn"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2008, 2:40 pm
Karl Llewellyn haunted the Supreme Court this term, when Ali v Federal Bureau of Prisons was handed down on January 22nd. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:49 am
United States and Pearson v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
The winner of my request for the Llewellyn-like opinion about stopping people is smcelhaney, who pointed me to Judge Pratt's dissent in the 2nd Circuit case of United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 3:48 pm
” United States v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:46 am
This approach offers a relatively simple answer to one of the most important problems in constitutional theory: How do we explain the evident fact that the structure of our government and the rights of the people have changed pervasively since the Founding, in ways that are simply not reflected in Article V amendments to the canonical text? [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
(The consumer loan contract in Williams v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 8:57 am
: Password-sharing is a “ubiquitous, useful, and generally harmless” activity that “millions of people” engage in, United States v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 10:02 am
As an example of Realist interpretation, consider Justice Cardozo's decision in Steward Machine v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
" Stringfellow v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It also is the ultimate ground of the Court’s holding in McCulloch v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 4:25 am
We've Been Here Before: Florida v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
Karl Llewellyn didn’t agree (nor did Posner). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Llewellyn: If you pay peanuts you get monkeys; what kind of legal system do you want to have? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:59 pm
His view may be that Adarand and Loving v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
Here’s a bit of history, mostly from my reading of United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
In a separate libel claim, the football agent Paolo Vernazza and his ex-wife Sapphira, are suing the People newspaper over a story about Cole and her former husband, Ashley Cole, in a defamation and privacy claim. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:31 pm
For example, consider the recent GPS surveillance case before the Supreme Court — United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
Before Justice Scalia ever opened a law book, of course, the great Karl Llewellyn argued that for every canon there was an anti-canon, or at least enough exceptions to the canons to render them mostly unhelpful to ascertaining the meaning of state and federal laws.The main dispute today is between those who identify as "textualists" or "strict textualists" and those who identify as "purposivists. [read post]
