Search for: "People v. Lock"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,046
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2019, 8:27 am
An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:24 pm
" Faus Group Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:47 am
In Cook v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
The case is People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:58 pm
I'm not a huge fan of locking people up for excruciatingly long periods. [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:25 am
Last week in Preap v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
On Oct. 3, the ACLU will be back in the Supreme Court to argue Jennings v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
On Oct. 3, the ACLU will be back in the Supreme Court to argue Jennings v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 6:08 am
In People v King a two to one panel of the Court of Appeals narrowly defined what a locked enclosure was in a manufacturing of marijuana case. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:15 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:07 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:49 am
People v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 10:00 am
Jennings v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:05 am
United States, 281 F. 119, 120 (6th Cir. 1922) (Two people locked in a room and regularly given narcotics). [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 1:41 pm
The decision in Reid v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:45 am
The case, Hernandez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 12:24 am
Liberal critic Marc Garneau told CBC.ca that the bill seemed to be missing an exception that would allow people to break digital locks if it was for private, non-commercial use. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 1:52 pm
I express no necessary normative judgment about whether locking people up in these circumstances makes sense, or whether there's a superior alternative. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:30 pm
Gordon v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
The people who wrote Prop. 21 knew full well how to lock in the existing statutory definitions when that's what they intended. [read post]
