Search for: "People v. Lockwood" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2007, 6:10 am
A horrible set of facts confronted the First Department yesterday in People v Dickerson, 2007 NY Slip Op 04718 where the Court had to decide whether the starvation constituted depraved indifference murder, or criminally negligent homicide. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Bingham of Ohio and the Historical Context of the Fourteenth Amendment" Cynthia Nicoletti (Assistant Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law) "The Disputed Constitutionality of the Emancipation Proclamation"11:00-12:30 | Panel TwoStephen Mihm (University of Georgia), chairPaul Kens (Professor of Political Science, Texas State University at San Marcos) "Big Business and the Reconstruction Amendments: Lessons from Munn v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:42 pm by David
David Cassuto From the email: The DePaul Center for Animal Law cordially invites you and your colleagues to join us for this year’s symposium, “Revisiting the Line between Free Speech and Obscenity: U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[vii] Thus, directors, officers, managers and similarly situated people need to closely examine the governing documents of the entity to determine what protection, if any, is conferred. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 8:03 am
"Federalism" in this sense is a national policy of a national people that this national people could change at will through an Article V amendment or by changing the composition of SCOTUS or some other formal or informal constitutional means. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Stephen Bilkis
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v… [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v… [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:45 am by Victoria Kwan
” As part of a night celebrating the life and career of Belva Lockwood, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg presided over a moot court re-enactment of Bradwell v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 11:09 pm
Look at a case from Australia called Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v. [read post]