Search for: "People v. London" Results 41 - 60 of 1,449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2015, 3:37 pm by Giles Peaker
Waltham have been here before – in Arfon Abdi v LB Waltham Forest. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:04 pm
As former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart observed, "'[P]roperty does not have rights, only people do.'" (p. 254 [attorney Scott Bullock quoting Potter Stewart].)In other words, with eminent domain, it's about people, not property.Jeff Benedict's Little Pink House especially reveals and revels in the human drama surrounding the Kelo v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
 Critics fear the Tories will now move to cripple Ofcom — and then quietly relax the restrictions on Sky News … THE PRESS GANG campaign — The People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
“I had people at a bridge game stop me and ask, ‘How could you have written that opinion? [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Anthony Fairclough
The London Borough of Haringey could have made up the shortfall in funding, but decided against this. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:08 pm by Giles Peaker
HA, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Ealing [2015] EWHC 2375 (Admin) This is, I think, a very significant case for all Councils who have or are considering setting residence requirements in their allocation policies. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:52 am by Pace Law Library
City of New London [videorecording] : 545 U.S. 469 (2005) / produced by Thomas Metzloff, Sarah Wood, Todd ShoemakerLucas v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm by David Smith
Macattram v Camden London Borough Council (2012) QBD (Admin) On Lawtel but no on BAILII This is an interesting little problem involving the payment of Council Tax. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm by David Smith
Macattram v Camden London Borough Council (2012) QBD (Admin) On Lawtel but no on BAILII This is an interesting little problem involving the payment of Council Tax. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
In the case of David v Hosany [2017] EWHC 2787 (QB), His Honour Judge Moloney QC considered a libel claim brought by the claimant, a Governor of the East London Foundation NHS Trust, in respect of three publications by the defendant, another Governor of the same Trust. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
So, it follows that s 189(1)(c) must contemplate homeless people who would be more vulnerable than many others in the same position. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:08 am by Dr Christy Shucksmith
Humanitarianism v. the State: Migration as an issue of national security or human security. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:30 am by Darryl Hutcheson, Matrix
Anyone would in a sense be “vulnerable” when homeless but section 189 sought to identify people with a priority need for accommodation ([[51] and [93]). [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 12:22 am
[www.nylj.com] Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, plaintiff-appellant v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:53 am
Lindsay, K&L Gates, London Eurocom Limited v Siemens PLC [2014] EWHC 3710 (TCC) http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2014/3710.html It is never easy to resist an action for enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision. [read post]