Search for: "People v. London"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am
Smartsource v Information Commissioner + 19 other parties [2010] UKUT 415 (AAC) 23rd November 2010 – read judgment Ibsen’s Enemy of the People has Dr Stockmann complaining to his Norwegian municipality about contamination of its water supply. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:57 am
Does 1-21 (renamed London-Sire v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
Critics fear the Tories will now move to cripple Ofcom — and then quietly relax the restrictions on Sky News … THE PRESS GANG campaign — The People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:37 pm
Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:23 am
This building is ten stories high and, on its top floor, has a viewing platform which offers panoramic views of London. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:37 pm
Waltham have been here before – in Arfon Abdi v LB Waltham Forest. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:04 pm
As former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart observed, "'[P]roperty does not have rights, only people do.'" (p. 254 [attorney Scott Bullock quoting Potter Stewart].)In other words, with eminent domain, it's about people, not property.Jeff Benedict's Little Pink House especially reveals and revels in the human drama surrounding the Kelo v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
The London Borough of Haringey could have made up the shortfall in funding, but decided against this. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm
The judge in Gardener v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:40 am
In Ladele v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:47 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)Bajwa & Ors, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 1093 (06 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division)TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2011] EWCA Civ 526 (06 May 2011) C (A Child), Re [2011] EWCA Civ 521 (06 May 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)Potts v Densley & Anor [2011] EWHC 1144 (QB) (06 May 2011) Bacon v Automattic Inc & Ors [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) (06 May 2011)High Court (Chancery… [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:08 pm
HA, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Ealing [2015] EWHC 2375 (Admin) This is, I think, a very significant case for all Councils who have or are considering setting residence requirements in their allocation policies. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:52 am
City of New London [videorecording] : 545 U.S. 469 (2005) / produced by Thomas Metzloff, Sarah Wood, Todd ShoemakerLucas v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm
Macattram v Camden London Borough Council (2012) QBD (Admin) On Lawtel but no on BAILII This is an interesting little problem involving the payment of Council Tax. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm
Macattram v Camden London Borough Council (2012) QBD (Admin) On Lawtel but no on BAILII This is an interesting little problem involving the payment of Council Tax. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 8:51 am
The motion in London-Sire v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:45 am
So, it follows that s 189(1)(c) must contemplate homeless people who would be more vulnerable than many others in the same position. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
Anyone would in a sense be “vulnerable” when homeless but section 189 sought to identify people with a priority need for accommodation ([[51] and [93]). [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
In the case of David v Hosany [2017] EWHC 2787 (QB), His Honour Judge Moloney QC considered a libel claim brought by the claimant, a Governor of the East London Foundation NHS Trust, in respect of three publications by the defendant, another Governor of the same Trust. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:08 am
Humanitarianism v. the State: Migration as an issue of national security or human security. [read post]
