Search for: "People v. Loomis" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am by Andrew Kent
But the Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 7:59 pm
"Conclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient" (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Selassie, 166 AD2d 358, 359, lv denied 77 NY2d 911). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm by Timothy Edgar
In my last post, I said that the European Court of Justice decision in Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
Alex Loomis also analyzed possible impacts of Trump’s tweets on travel ban litigation. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Much of the recent debate in the U.S. has focused on the case of Loomis v Wisconsin. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:01 pm
Two of our California cases have had a big impact on the way schools in that state and nationwide address the pervasive problem of anti-gay harassment: Loomis v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:21 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Alex Loomis posted a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Ziglar v. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm by Schachtman
As though people, other than McDonald’s coffee drinkers, needed such a recommendation. [read post]