Search for: "People v. Lopez (1981)"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2010, 4:34 pm
Generally, appellate courts cannot consider trial testimony in reviewing a decision denying a pretrial motion (People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 720 [1981]). [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am
Shortly thereafter, the caller phoned again, believing she was speaking with Lopez-Cruz, but instead informed Soto that there were two people next to a house where there was a lot of lighting, and gave instructions to drive there, flash his high beams, and the two people would come out. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:44 am
People v Fenner, 61 NY2d 971, 973, [1984]), the People did not produce the arrest warrant itself prior to the conclusion of the hearing (see Lopez, 206 AD2d at 894; People v McLoyd, 35 Misc 3d 822, 828, 946 N.Y.S.2d 829 [Sup Ct, NY County 2012]). [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:53 am
Furthermore, the attorney's conduct did not consist of "egregious and prejudicial error such that defendant did not receive a fair trial" (People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713 [1998], citing People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 188-189 [1994]), but rather "viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal[s] that the attorney provided meaningful representation" (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147… [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 1:21 pm
Lopez; and People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:27 pm
Indiana, 452 U.S. 314, 329 n.17 (1981); United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
(People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:02 am
According to People v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
NURSES YOLANDA LOPEZ ET AL McAllen Hospitals, L.P. v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 6:11 am
”); Lopez v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 11:14 am
Law Inst. 1981); see also In re Standard Jury Instructions–Contract & Bus. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 144 (2006) (likewise); Miller v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:10 am
A group of 14 employees initially filed a class action suit under Section 1981 in October 2008 (Brown v Yellow Transp, Inc, No 08 CV 5908). [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:30 pm
Marin, Marguerite V. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), did not have a substantial and injurious effect on the jury verdict. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
S. 361, 364 (1981), we observed that this right was designed to assure fairness in the adversary criminal process. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
Lopez, 514 U. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
A group of 14 employees initially filed a class action suit under Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act in October 2008 (Brown, et al. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Lopez-Cruz, 730 F.3d 803 (9th Cir. 2013), Border Patrol officers stopped the defendant’s vehicle, suspecting he might be involved in alien smuggling. [read post]
