Search for: "People v. Lopez (1981)" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2010, 4:34 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Generally, appellate courts cannot consider trial testimony in reviewing a decision denying a pretrial motion (People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 720 [1981]). [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am by Susan Brenner
Shortly thereafter, the caller phoned again, believing she was speaking with Lopez-Cruz, but instead informed Soto that there were two people next to a house where there was a lot of lighting, and gave instructions to drive there, flash his high beams, and the two people would come out. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:44 am by Brian Shiffrin
People v Fenner, 61 NY2d 971, 973, [1984]), the People did not produce the arrest warrant itself prior to the conclusion of the hearing (see Lopez, 206 AD2d at 894; People v McLoyd, 35 Misc 3d 822, 828, 946 N.Y.S.2d 829 [Sup Ct, NY County 2012]). [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:53 am
Furthermore, the attorney's conduct did not consist of "egregious and prejudicial error such that defendant did not receive a fair trial" (People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713 [1998], citing People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 188-189 [1994]), but rather "viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal[s] that the attorney provided meaningful representation" (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147… [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 144 (2006) (likewise); Miller v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:10 am by Heidi Henson
A group of 14 employees initially filed a class action suit under Section 1981 in October 2008 (Brown v Yellow Transp, Inc, No 08 CV 5908). [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), did not have a substantial and injurious effect on the jury verdict. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am by Gideon
S. 361, 364 (1981), we observed that this right was designed to assure fairness in the adversary criminal process. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
A group of 14 employees initially filed a class action suit under Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act in October 2008 (Brown, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Standard of Review and Applicable LawThe test for legal sufficiency is "whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to reach the verdict under review. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Dear Friends:Just wanted to tell you about this case that was recently decided against Aurora Loan Services. [read post]