Search for: "People v. Lopez (1987)"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am
Shortly thereafter, the caller phoned again, believing she was speaking with Lopez-Cruz, but instead informed Soto that there were two people next to a house where there was a lot of lighting, and gave instructions to drive there, flash his high beams, and the two people would come out. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:44 am
People v Fenner, 61 NY2d 971, 973, [1984]), the People did not produce the arrest warrant itself prior to the conclusion of the hearing (see Lopez, 206 AD2d at 894; People v McLoyd, 35 Misc 3d 822, 828, 946 N.Y.S.2d 829 [Sup Ct, NY County 2012]). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 1:07 pm
Lopez (1987) 197 Cal. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:45 pm
The "United States" sounds like "We the people. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
Lopez (1995). [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
With respect to Congress’ role, no one disputes that Congress enacted the current version of Section 1326(d) in response to the Supreme Court’s 1987 decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm
Peoples, 668 F. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Dole (1987), Morrison v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Dole (1987), Morrison v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:03 pm
§ 1326(d), was enacted by Congress after the court’s 1987 decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
(People v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:28 pm
United States (1992), and United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
’ Lopez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:21 am
Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987). [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:33 pm
Lopez, 45 Misc. 3d 1207 (A)(Dis. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 11:23 am
Supreme Court in Penry v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Robin: While I was writing this book, I constantly had people, the most well meaning, liberal-minded people, tell me who Thomas is and what he thinks. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am
South Carolina (1992) and Lawrence v. [read post]
