Search for: "People v. Lowe"
Results 221 - 240
of 5,219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 10:23 am
From Trump v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
In the “low stakes” bank case, 95% of people attributed knowledge, while in the “high stakes” case 86% did. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
”[22] Even if the commenter’s estimate is too high because the rule has been pared back from the proposal, the direct costs of disclosure are likely to be higher than the Commission’s estimated costs, such as the aggregate annual $16 million in professional costs for all affected filers.[23] Costs likely will be disproportionately high (and the benefits may be disproportionately low)[24] for investors in small public companies,[25] for which the Commission has provided… [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
Only 30 people worked in the ICE FOIA Office, which now boasts 60 personnel. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:17 pm
Dodson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
Instead, again, they cite to Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 3:13 am
(June 1, 2020), https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2020/06/01/570571.htm. [2] BJ’s Wholesale Club Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 7:37 am
” People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
And by the way, we agree with Will Baude that it's hard to see how people ever have standing to sue for nominal damages. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
The Georgia Supreme Court, in Nunn v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:48 pm
Admittedly, that’s a pretty low bar. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:41 pm
Headache and low-grade fever may also accompany this illness. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm
Quoting its 1978 opinion in TVA v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
At the Atlantic, Adam Serwer critiques Justice Thomas's analysis of the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause in the Court's Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
I have never seen statistics that low. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:38 am
Biden v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 12:40 pm
Missouri v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
I admit that I'm no expert in the doctrine in this area, though I do watch it out of the corner of my eye, and I can't recall reading a more ridiculous standing decision in the last 10 years or so than the one the Court endorsed in the 303 Creative v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:49 pm
See R. v. [read post]
