Search for: "People v. MacDonald" Results 21 - 40 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2020, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
The original two judgments can be found here : A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWFC 38 (11 May 2020) (Main judgment) A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1162 (Fam) (11 May 2020 (Original decision to anonymise) The latest judgment can be found here : PA Media Group v London Borough of Haringey & Ors [2020] EWHC 1282 (Fam) (20 May 2020) You can read Louise Tickle’s tweet thread here : Our team member @louisetickle is a… [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:28 am by INFORRM
” Likewise, a document on the ‘remote family court’ issued by Mr Justice MacDonald on Monday (23/3) gives detailed and worrying insights into the technological limitations of existing technology; for example, on recording: “With judges conducting remote hearings on a variety of platforms, on occasion without the support of court staff due closure [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
First, the criminal defamation statute arguably fails to provide "people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits" and what speech is acceptable…. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Court then used the factors from R. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Doull-MacDonald, 2017: 65 I also find as a fact that Ms. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
MacDonald & Anor v Carnbroe Estates Ltd (Scotland), heard 2 May 2019. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:08 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Human Rights Policy cites R. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 7:14 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Sara Leamon, a criminal defence lawyer in Vancouver, stated in The Georgia Straight, If his tax reform laws are to move forward, many people will suffer. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 8:58 am by Bill Otis
(I had my hand in furnishing both to several corrupt Chicago police early in my career,  United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Canada The case of Hudspeth v Whatcott 2017 ONSC 1708 concerned a proposed class action on behalf of 500,000 people who marched on the 2016 Pride Toronto Parade. [read post]