Search for: "People v. Mack" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2011, 7:24 pm by Peter Tillers
Mack, 423 Mass. 288, 291 (1996) ("the concept of reasonable doubt is not a mathematical one"). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm by Steven M. Gursten
See, e.g., Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm , 480 Mich 75, 91 n 13 (2008); Al-Shimmari v Detroit Med Ctr, 477 Mich 280, 297 n 10; 731 NW2d 29 (2007); Neal v Wilkes, 470 Mich 661, 667 n 8; 685 NW2d 648 (2004); People v Hickman, 470 Mich 602, 610 n 6; 684 NW2d 267 (2004); Mack v Detroit, 467 Mich 186, 203 n 19; 649 NW2d 47 (2002).” [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
Mack, appellant NEW YORK COUNTYBusiness LawAttorney General Alleges Sovereign Interest for Parens Patriae Standing People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:19 pm
BRONX COUNTYCriminal Practice Defendant Denied Withdrawal of Guilty Plea; Court Found Claims of Innocence, Coercion Lacked Merit People v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Mack, 1988 CanLII 24 (SCC), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 903, sanctioned, but narrowly confined, the power of police to step beyond their normal investigative role and tempt people into committing criminal offences. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am by Steven Hansen
There is quite a bit packed in this relatively short bill so have a quick read below and see if the provisions will affect your business.This bill and the path it has taken is an example of why people are very frustrated with Congress and getting legislation passed in general. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court rejects the defendant's contention that, since he did not waive his right to appeal, the Brady claim is subject to review akin to People v Mack and People v Land. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am by thejaghunter
JAG HUNTER here: Thomas Jefferson said: “When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.” [read post]
13 May 2015, 11:52 am
“A victim surcharge is an additional penalty imposed on convicted offenders at the time of sentencing,” Nicholson told a House of Commons committee.The ruling by Glass in R v. [read post]