Search for: "People v. Maltz" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
Kramer, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (Oxford, 2004) Danie [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 1:41 pm by Howard Knopf
They were my clients in an unsuccessful copyright infringement lawsuit in the Federal Court of Canada alleging copyright and moral rights infringement of their documentary.I get asked a lot about the controversial case of Maltz v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Maltz’s biography of Chief Justice Burger and Leonard Levy’s Against the Law: The Nixon Court and Criminal Justice. [read post]
12 May 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Signal Increasing Interest in the Internet of Things https://t.co/5AX4OAaO6u -> Data transfers in limbo – U.S. companies face fines by German data protection authorities https://t.co/uw0R7mubEI -> Court decision finds copyright in compilation of seismic data https://t.co/UbOtqsTfxC -> Google Isn’t Required To De-Index Negative Ripoff Report–Fakhrian v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
Prominent legal scholar Earl Maltz has an important new article arguing that Reynolds v. [read post]