Search for: "People v. Mandell" Results 1 - 20 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2006, 6:53 am
If there is no hindsight bias then there is no need to mitigate its effect.Read Professor Mandel's article "Patently Non-Obvious II: Experimental Study on the Hindsight Issue Before the Supreme Court in KSR v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
Mandel) but then goes on to apply the essentially toothless standard of rational basis scrutiny. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
Next, while acknowledging that the Court has allowed limited judicial review where an immigration policy allegedly violates a U.S. citizen’s constitutional rights (per Mandel and Kerry v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Most people are better at problem-solving; few are proficient at both. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:43 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
And his studies can have real-world impact: In its landmark 2006 ruling in eBay v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm by Michael O'Hear
(13, 15-16) Mandel relied on an old Second Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
In this vein, the recent Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) decision in Gitxaala Nation v Canada was heralded as a major legal victory for Indigenous peoples opposing the opposing the Enbridge pipelines and tankers proposal, and many hope that we are now on a pathway to put that risky project to rest for good. [read post]