Search for: "People v. Manning (1982)" Results 1 - 20 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2007, 11:47 pm
" Nevertheless, critics of the Texas law say it's an aberration -- a slippery legal statute that stands in direct violation of the 1982 Supreme Court decision in Enmund v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:18 am by Steve Hall
But Lambert recently discovered a 1982 document in which Jackson identifies a third man named Lawrence Woodlock as a co-defendant, presumably to the robbery he committed with Lambert and Reese.Lambert said prosecutors never disclosed the "police activity sheet" that contained this information in violation of Supreme Court precedent in Brady v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
  Yes, it was released commercially on the Xerox Star and PERQ workstations in 1982, and I used my first one in 1972 at the National Research Council of Canada. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
" Back then my uncle was a Ford man, my father a GM man, and all I knew for certain was that like two parallel lines, the two would never intersect. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
My view is that people have a First Amendment right to speak anonymously online -- see, e.g., McIntyre v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 3:52 am
Reasonable suspicion is defined as "the quantum of knowledge sufficient to induce an ordinarily prudent and cautious man under the circumstances to believe criminal activity is at hand" (People v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Supreme Court in 1869, ruled that Texas did NOT have a right to secede, in the case, Texas v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Michael Posluns
That had been Preston Manning’s argument against ratifying the Nisga'a treaty in 2000. [read post]