Search for: "People v. Marks"
Results 1 - 20
of 8,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, "Power to the People" -- Response to the Review Symposium [read post]
4 May 2021, 6:12 am
Criminal procedure — Brady violation — Investigators’ notes Mark Hollingsworth shot and killed two people and seriously injured a third on January 18, 1998. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 8:10 am
June 21, 2012: This week marks the thirteenth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:41 am
No big surprise here, but the Federal Court decision of HomeAway.com, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:27 am
People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 2:09 am
What happens to those people who are selling 1 finger or 2 bar variations on a theme? [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
However, he doubts that it will make a practical difference in many cases since, even if no unfair advantage is taken and no detriment inflicted, the chances of there being a likelihood of confusion will generally prevent the later mark being registered].This Kat expects the CJEU to go along with AG Wahl's Opinion, though he would be the first to agree that many a surprising ruling has emerged from that august body.What makes people sweat here and hereWhat makes… [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 7:30 am
The People" has passed the 3 million visitor mark. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 11:42 am
Cain gets marked and cursed by the Lord. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:35 pm
And the police just so happen to target people with criminal -- especially drug -- records for "random" suspicionless searches of their cabin.As Mark Laborde learned far too late. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:23 am
Haaland v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:54 am
Last month, in a case called Unique Product Solutions v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:13 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am
§295) to prevent people from deceiving the public into believing their goods were patented. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 8:21 am
Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
A likelihood of confusion between similar marks is not determined on whether people will be confused between the marks, but rather whether the marks will confuse people into believing that the marks’ goods or services derive from the same origin or sponsorship: Paula Payne Prods. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:16 am
FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
