Search for: "People v. Marques"
Results 1 - 20
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2008, 4:34 am
Many people regard the Locarno system as a pretty dull thing, but it is not unimportant -- and may be increasingly useful if MARQUES' proposals are adopted. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:17 am
MARQUES news. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:31 pm
The reference is eBay France v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
and serial MARQUES activists Adrian Smith and David Stone. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:50 am
Today the MARQUES Class 46 weblog posted the most recent update of its little guide to the practice of IP offices regarding the receipt by users of their patent and trade mark systems of apparently official requests for payments. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:51 pm
In Ogden v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 4:09 am
As for Brown v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:14 am
This Kat is trying to avoid copyright liabilityWelcome to this week's roundup of recent stories and commentary from around the IP blogosphere.PatentsGermany's Federal Court of Justice handed down a potentially extremely significant judgment for SEP/FRAND in Europe, in the case of SISVEL v Haier. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 10:08 am
At last year's well-attended "Ask the Trade Mark Judges" session, jointly run by MARQUES and IBIL, Mr Justice Birss was asked whether, in the light of guidance from the Court of Appeal in Interflora v Marks & Spencer (noted by the IPKat here), if survey evidence was dead in trade mark litigation, an audience of several hundred people heard his answer -- though the social media can be guaranteed to give different slants on it. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
But what is MARQUES planning for its members? [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:46 am
La Marque, 2021 WL 1997376 (D. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 1:48 am
Come to the MARQUES sub-forum! [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:48 am
Well, criminal and civil enforcers, legislators, government ministers, backbenchers, policy-makers, diplomats, people who have influence and can pass legislation, people who can enforce it -- here's a challenge to you. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:43 am
Then Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:29 pm
Here’s how the terrible decision in City of Parma, Ohio v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
Search: Warrant: Fourth Amendment: Exclusionary rule: Good faith: Data:In People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:16 am
MARQUES Class 46 (trade marks) covered Case T-250/15, Speciality Drinks Ltd v EUIPO (24 November 2016), where the EU General Court upheld the decision of the Board of Appeal which found that there was a likelihood of confusion between the word mark CLAN and the earlier mark CLAN MACGREGOR under Article 8(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (207/2009/EC).Trump's Nomination of Neil Gorsuch and Intellectual PropertyThe impact of Neil… [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:19 am
This includes, but is not limited to, law books -- some of which concern intellectual property, and some of which are written by people of the highest repute. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Meanwhile, you can enjoy watching him giving this excellent talk on design protection back in 2012.Many people in big business still thinkthat SMEs look something like this ...Around the weblogs 1. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
