Search for: "People v. Marshall" Results 61 - 80 of 1,804
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
”  One response was to give Congress concrete new powers to enforce the amendments, borrowing the “appropriate” language from Chief Justice Marshall’s epochal opinion in McCulloch v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 1:07 pm by Ilya Somin
Liberal lions Harry Blackmun, William Brennan, and Thurgood Marshall dissented. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:17 pm by Mark Walsh
” She finishes, and Roberts looks to Marshal Gail Curley to gavel the day’s session to a close. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Black people were accepted as citizens entitled to equal civil rights, not because the 3 [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
” Chief Justice John Marshall and others in the founding generation followed a third way, most prominently in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[27] Other unusual vehicles for E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have included unpasteurized juices, yogurt, dried salami, mayonnaise, raw milk, game meats, sprouts, and raw cookie dough.[28] According to a recent study, an estimated 93,094 illnesses are due to domestically acquired E. coli O157:H7 each year in the United… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:30 am by Neil Siegel
Rather, the Constitution assigns main responsibility for deciding them to Congress, where, as Chief Justice Marshall explained in McCulloch v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]