Search for: "People v. Martin"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,824
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2023, 6:55 am
North Carolina v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 10:22 am
People break up. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 11:20 pm
In Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Martin. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Christopher Kurka allowed Pat Martin, head of Alaska Right to Life, to use their offices for several hours when Martin traveled from Wasilla to the state Capitol “with the stated intent to distribute signed petitions to the Legislature. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:36 am
Ayer Chair in Business Law and Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:09 am
Nov. 17, 2023). 2Id. 3First Baptist Church of Iowa Louisiana v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 2:55 pm
City of Boise (9th Cir. 2019) 920 F.3d 584 (“Martin”) and Johnson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:21 am
"Ed Johnson, the long-time Oregon Law Center lawyer in the Portland case, was also the plaintiffs’ lawyer in the recent Grants Pass case that extended the rule adopted by the Ninth Circuit in the notorious decision Martin v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:22 am
Funny ones really. 00:35:19 gretchen desutter: A favorite scene with Monica was a Twins v Yankees game. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
The company was fined for taking more than 20 billion images of people in the UK found online and on social media to feed its facial recognition database. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm
He argued that the better approach was that of Martin Luther King, who wanted a society in which people were judged by the content of their character rather than the colour of their skin, and which emphasised what people of all races had in common. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
See also South Hetton Coal Co v North-Eastern News Association [1894] 1 QB 133; Jones v Halton [1909] 2 KB 444; Browne v DC Thomson & Co [1912] SC 359; Irish People’s Assurance Society v City of Dublin Assurance Company Ltd [1929] IR 25 (SC); Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1944] AC 116, [1944] UKHL 1 (03 April 1944); Awolowo v Zik Enterprises… [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
City of Philadelphia (Standing to challenge public holiday) Martin v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:37 pm
Lockheed Martin, involving whether a foreign government’s purchase of military equipment from a U.S. supplier is “commercial activity” for which they can be sued in U.S. courts Dermody v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:19 pm
In Arc Mercer, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
