Search for: "People v. Martin"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Conundrum follows--yet most participants in the chattering about this remain blissfully oblivious to the analytics of that conundrum.It ought to surprise few people, then, that in this anarchic and dynamic environment, the concept of value maximization, its meaning, and its relevance remains hotly contested, sometimes as part of the debate about corporate purpose (see Brief Thoughts on Martin Lipton: "ESG, Stakeholder Governance, and the Duty of the Corporation"… [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:45 pm
Martin Luther King, Jr. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
The “governed”—the American people (“We the people”)—accept the system and process. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
Following changes to social distancing provisions in Wales, it was legal for only 50 fans to attended a Welsh rugby match outside, but 140 people watched it indoors from the clubhouse on Boxing Day. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
LSO v Widz[1] In Law Society of Ontario v Widz, 2022 ONLSTH 140, the issue was the penalty for a lawyer’s abuse of his partner. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
Police Dep't v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 1:31 pm
—Martin Luther King III __________________________________________________________1Islamorada Leisure Props. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 2:10 pm
In Martin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm
Organisations that do not act responsibly, posing risks to vulnerable people, or fail to meet ICO expectations will be investigated. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 10:37 pm
On page 3, that one specifically points to the Mannheim Regional Court's Nokia v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
During the course of today and tomorrow, the UK Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Lord Advocate’s Reference in relation to the Scottish Independence Referendum Bill (the “Bill”). [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 5:12 pm
Ironically, that’s the one defense that, per the Supreme Court’s recent pronouncement in Google v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
In December 2015, Russian hackers launched a cyberattack that took down three regional electric power distribution networks in western Ukraine, leaving 225,000 people without power for several hours during cold winter conditions. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 5:16 am
The ruling reaffirms and expands on a similar decision, Martin v, City of Boise, that the same court issued in 2018. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 12:23 am
Schwartz, Sabastian V. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:34 pm
GermanyDer Dritte Weg v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Some people may possess a sense of fairness that opposes disproportionately high taxes on them as a matter of principle, but for most, what matters more is how it affects the broader public: what it does for the Commonwealth’s economy, understood in terms of jobs, growth, opportunity, and income-earning potential for individuals who will never join the rarified company of those actually remitting under the proposed surtax. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Maryland, Martin v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
In that respect, Pennsylvania's law is influencing what Fox in New York is allowed to say to people all over the country (indeed, all over the world). [read post]
