Search for: "People v. Martin"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,593
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
See also South Hetton Coal Co v North-Eastern News Association [1894] 1 QB 133; Jones v Halton [1909] 2 KB 444; Browne v DC Thomson & Co [1912] SC 359; Irish People’s Assurance Society v City of Dublin Assurance Company Ltd [1929] IR 25 (SC); Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1944] AC 116, [1944] UKHL 1 (03 April 1944); Awolowo v Zik Enterprises… [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
City of Philadelphia (Standing to challenge public holiday) Martin v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:37 pm
Lockheed Martin, involving whether a foreign government’s purchase of military equipment from a U.S. supplier is “commercial activity” for which they can be sued in U.S. courts Dermody v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:19 pm
In Arc Mercer, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Martin has died. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
In fact, Eastern Europe is best understood as part of the wider “Global East,” which scholar Martin Müller defines as “all those societies… too rich to be in the South, too poor to be in the North… suspended somewhere in the shadows… not quite belonging to either. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:19 am
From yesterday's decision in Scofield v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
These foundational issues have kept black robed people busy for centuries and will continue to do so. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:23 am
From Trump v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
Regarding data breaches, Transunion LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
The story cites a range of allegations, some of which would involve criminality, made against a person identifying as “Martin Branning”. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
His lecture will be preceded by an introductory talk and tour of the church by John Martin. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 11:29 pm
For instance, the facts in the ECtHR case Künsberg Sarre v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
’ (Kohler v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Martin (D. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
And by the way, we agree with Will Baude that it's hard to see how people ever have standing to sue for nominal damages. [read post]