Search for: "People v. Martinez (1986)" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Colorado Martinez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
District Court for the District of Colorado Martinez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Janus didn't discuss Turner or PruneYard, and mentioned Rumsfeld only for the narrow proposition that "government may not 'impose penalties or withhold benefits based on membership in a disfavored group' where doing so 'ma[kes] group membership less attractive.'"[134] And the compelled contribution cases, of which Janus is the most recent, have drawn a line between compelling people to fund the views expressed by a particular private speaker (such as the… [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
Many religious people are understandably upset when they have to subsidize blasphemy. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 In Henry v Cash Biz the Supremes had another chance to demonstrate their commitment to denying people harmed by shady business practices from getting any relief from the State’s judicial system; they embraced that opportunity wholeheartedly as much as coldheartedly, with not a single member of the court writing in dissent. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Hepps (1986) (generally rejecting the view that the burden of proving truth can be placed on the defendant); R.A.V. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
This morning, people in coffee houses and churches across the land will no doubt be talking about the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 With respect to grand jury proceedings, the district attorney has a “duty of fair dealing to the accused” (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 105 [1984]; see also, People v Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20, 26 [1986]) and to the court (People v Ianniello, 21 NY2d 418, 424 [1968]). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
Martinez, 613 F.2d 473, 481 (3d Cir. 1980);  Reynolds Offset Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  The police are paid to arrest people. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:51 am by Lyle Denniston
The Justices were scheduled to consider at their Thursday private Conference the California tuition case (Martinez v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:38 pm by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (6th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Petitioner's reply Title: Martinez v. [read post]