Search for: "People v. Martinez (1994)" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accepting as true the facts set forth in the complaint and according plaintiff the benefit of all favorable inferences arising therefrom, as we must in the context of the instant motion (see generally Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), we conclude that the complaint fails to plead a cognizable theory for legal malpractice because plaintiff’s allegations do not support even an inference that any alleged negligence by defendants was a proximate cause of… [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Janus didn't discuss Turner or PruneYard, and mentioned Rumsfeld only for the narrow proposition that "government may not 'impose penalties or withhold benefits based on membership in a disfavored group' where doing so 'ma[kes] group membership less attractive.'"[134] And the compelled contribution cases, of which Janus is the most recent, have drawn a line between compelling people to fund the views expressed by a particular private speaker (such as the… [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
” That’s a lot of disagreement for people who agree on the disposition of a case. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Since the program started in 1994, 714 people have entered, and only three have left. [read post]