Search for: "People v. Martinez (1995)"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
Thornton (1995): "I join the opinion of the Court. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Martinez, 561 U.S. 661, 680 (2010). [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
As outlined in Martinez v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 10:41 am
This is the current policy, which protects all ideas, whether or not people label them "racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:38 pm
Rector (1995) and Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Many religious people are understandably upset when they have to subsidize blasphemy. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am
Starke 62 F.3d 1374, 1389 (11th Cir 1995) quoting United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
In Henry v Cash Biz the Supremes had another chance to demonstrate their commitment to denying people harmed by shady business practices from getting any relief from the State’s judicial system; they embraced that opportunity wholeheartedly as much as coldheartedly, with not a single member of the court writing in dissent. [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:16 am
Central Michigan Univ., 55 F.3d 1177, 1184-85 (6th Cir. 1995); DeJohn v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:16 am
Martinez (2010) reaffirms this as to student group recognition decisions. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
Some people, sure they need it. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:35 am
(People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:27 pm
" Judge Diane Wood ruled, relying on the language in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
For example, when notice of opportunity to testify before the grand jury is provided to defense counsel, failure to timely make defendant aware of such notice or otherwise protect defendant’s right to testify (by failing to provide the People with written notice of the defendant’s desire to testify, for example) is ineffective (see, People v Jiminez, supra; People v Prest, 105 AD2d 1078 [4th Dept 1984]; see also, People… [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
Building on Martinez in this term, the Court decided Trevino v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
In the 1995 Supreme Court case of Rosenberger v. [read post]
