Search for: "People v. May (1989)" Results 1 - 20 of 1,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2015, 1:05 pm
He was convicted of theft in 1988 and incurred two burglary convictions, his two strikes, in 1989. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:58 pm
 You may perhaps be granted parole, but the trial court properly found that you're not entitled to resentencing. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 11:25 pm
AC, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWHC 3036 (Admin) was a judicial review which concerned funding for an illegal overstayer and her family under s.17 Children Act 1989, although it would also apply for s.20 funding. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976… [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:08 am by S
This is a quick note on a quite important case concerning duties owed to young people who are over 18 and who should have been, but in fact were not, provided with accommodation under s.20, Children Act 1989 prior to their 18th birthday. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:38 pm
Many of the Illinois traffic laws are written in broad terms and the discretion for enforcing them is vested in the Illinois Secretary of State. 625 ILCS 5/2-101; People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 A good example of a situation in which the five day period for a § 190.50 motion may be extended is provided by People v Prest, 105 AD2d 1078 [4th Dept 1984]. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
Their Lordships referred to an earlier case, Gamble (1989) NI 268 where there was a common plan to kneecap the victim, but instead his throat was slashed and he was shot in the head. [read post]