Search for: "People v. McBride"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm
Last week, in the case of The Citizen 1978 Ltd v McBride ([2011] ZACC 11) the South African Constitutional Court handed down a ground-breaking decision in the defamation case brought by Robert McBride, the former Ekurhuleni metro police chief, against The Citizen newspaper, who had called McBride a criminal and a murderer. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:15 pm
In the case, People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 8:23 am
Sarah McBride of The Wall Street Journal has written an interesting article on Capitol v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
In AT&T v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
When asked about the clause in the bill regarding “intersexuality”, Mr McBride said the clause was designed to deal “with attacking people’s sexual orientation in a vile way…”. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:10 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:19 am
GN Netcom, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:19 am
GN Netcom, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
STV has a report on McBride’s death here. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:34 pm
Prior to Marathon Entertainment v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
See Spartan Steel v Martin & Co [1973] 1 QB 27, 37; Lamb v Camden London Borough Council [1981] 1 QB 625, 634, 636–637. 2 See A. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 9:14 am
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Brandt v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 am
U.S. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 10:44 am
McBride It is no surprise that the legal system trails behind technological advancements. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:38 am
But 230 defendants routinely extract pieces of a third-party submission–sometimes as promotional previews, sometimes to fit publication constraints. 230(c)(1) has applied in so many cases fitting that paradigm (People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 12:34 am
In ABC v McBride [2001] NSWCA 322, the New South Wales Court of Appeal held that a defendant may rely on directly relevant facts – which in other circumstances might have been ingredients of a defence of justification – as mitigation of damages. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Related, CPSC finally holds public hearing on magnet sets standard [WLF Legal Pulse] SCOTUS sleeper Bond v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 8:48 am
People v McBride, 204 Mich App 678, (1994). [read post]
