Search for: "People v. McCarthy"
Results 21 - 40
of 375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2010, 12:14 pm
the Supreme Court in Muehler v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:32 am
The unemployment system is designed to provide benefits to people without jobs. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:46 am
Under those circumstances, we conclude that defendant did not knowingly waive his right to appeal with respect to Supreme Court's denial of the request by defendant for youthful offender status at sentencing (see generally People v McCarthy, 83 AD3d 1533, lv denied 17 NY3d 819; People v Fehr, 303 AD2d 1039, lv denied 100 NY2d 538; People v Hendricks, 270 AD2d 944). [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:51 pm
Colby & Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:33 am
" Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Doe 1 v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:39 am
Last month, an appeals court of Massachusetts ruled on a payment dispute between a policy holder and his insurance provider in an unpublished opinion, McCarthy v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:53 pm
EFF, along with the ACLU and several other organizations, filed amicus briefs in both Yang and McCarthy last year, as well as in another case decided on different grounds in the California Court of Appeal, People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:32 am
William Consovoy is a partner at Consovoy McCarthy PLLC, and counsel of record for the Project on Fair Representation, which filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 4:12 pm
Basildon District Council v McCarthy & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 13 was the Court of Appeal hearing of Basildon DC’s appeal against a High Court decision that, in effect, evictions could not proceed against individual households until individual consideration of their circumstances had been carried out. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 4:12 pm
Basildon District Council v McCarthy & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 13 was the Court of Appeal hearing of Basildon DC’s appeal against a High Court decision that, in effect, evictions could not proceed against individual households until individual consideration of their circumstances had been carried out. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:43 am
From the 6th Circuit’s decision last week in Wheaton v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 8:25 am
Similarly, in People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:59 pm
The attorneys who successfully fought for lead paint cleanup in People of California v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 10:09 am
” Cites to Howard v AOL, KinderStart v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:43 pm
Nimmer and McCarthy were on the list, but Chisum was not. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:52 am
McCarthy, Esq. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
It was held in Berkemer v McCarthy that there is no requirement, statutory or otherwise, that a DWI suspect submits to field sobriety tests. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:28 am
Earl, June 9, 2015, Indiana Supreme Court More Blog Entries: McCarthy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm
The first two defendants, Mr Thomson and Mr McCarthy, were hired to help Dr Waller. [read post]
